Donald Trump proved Khizr Kahn’s point about the candidate’s lack of familiarity — and respect — for the United States Constitution. Mr. Trump said Mr. Khan has “no right” to say publicly that Mr. Trump hasn’t read the Constitution.
Two points of fact:
— the First Amendment of the Constitution guarantees Mr. Kahn that right, especially as”fair comment and criticism” on a matter of public importance.
— Mr. Khan, the father of a Muslim-American Army captain killed in Iraq, did not say Mr. Trump has not read the Constitution. He asked the question: “Have you even read the US Constitution?”
It’s a reasonable question, given Mr. Trump’s many statements that suggest a disregard for Constitutional rights.
Mr. Trump’s statement that Mr. Kahn had “no right” suggests that either Mr. Trump has not read the Constitution, does not recall it or understand it, or holds a reckless disregard for it. For this and many other reasons, those who support Mr. Trump and think of themselves as true patriots and defenders of the Constitution, are well served to think about whether they are really backing a candidate who will “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
But the, the presidential oath also says “to the best of my ability,” and Mr. Trump has been entirely transparent in demonstrating his ability to understand and value the Constitution, so he won’t be violating his oath when he ignores and undermines it.
http://usat.ly/2anDzBq
Can I accuse you of fear mongering, Geoff when you point out that the oath asks only if the president-elect will perform “to the best of (their) ability?” That is indeed a terrifying thought!